Skip to content

Methodology

Every review on Worth or Skip ends in one of two words: WORTH IT or SKIP. There is no star rating, no score out of ten, and no “it depends” ending. If a product is only worth it under a condition, the verdict says the condition.

How a product gets reviewed

1. It has to be a real buying question

I write about products people are actively deciding on — the searches that end in “worth it”, “vs”, “alternatives”, “review”. I do not write round-ups of things nobody asked about in order to have a page for them.

2. I use it, or I say I did not

Hands-on wherever hands-on is possible: bought, installed, run on real work for long enough to hit the parts a demo never reaches. Where that is genuinely not possible — a product priced beyond what this site can justify, or one requiring an account type I do not qualify for — the review states that in the “What we checked” section, in plain words, near the top. It is never implied.

3. I check the claims, not the marketing

Specifications get verified against primary sources: the vendor’s own documentation, the pricing page on the date of writing, the terms of service, the actual invoice. Prices and plan structures change constantly, so every review carries a last checked date and describes the price as of that date.

4. I write who it is NOT for, first

Every review has a mandatory section listing the buyers who should walk away. It is written before the pros. A product that suits everybody is a product I have not understood yet.

5. I show more than one way to buy

Where alternatives exist, they are listed with the trade-off spelled out, and linked to more than one vendor. A page with exactly one link is a placement. A page that tells you when to buy something else is a recommendation.

6. The verdict gets stamped, with a reason on the same line

Why we publish SKIP

Because a review site that never says no has no information in it.

If every product I write about turns out to be worth buying, the only thing a reader learns from a WORTH IT stamp is that I found an affiliate programme. The SKIP verdicts are what make the WORTH IT verdicts mean anything. They cost me money — a SKIP page earns close to nothing — and that cost is precisely the point.

This has a consequence you can check: look at whether the SKIP reviews are on obscure products nobody sells, or on products with live, well-paying affiliate programmes. The second is the honest version.

What money does and does not buy

  • Some links here are affiliate links. If you buy through one, this site may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This is disclosed at the top of every page carrying such a link.
  • No vendor pays for a verdict, a placement, a position in a comparison table, or a review at all.
  • No vendor reads a review before it publishes.
  • Where a product, trial, or extended access is ever provided at no cost, that is disclosed inside the specific review it produced, by name, near the top — not only on the disclosure page.

When a verdict changes

Products change. A SKIP can become WORTH IT when the broken thing gets fixed, and a WORTH IT can become SKIP when a vendor is acquired, raises prices, or moves a feature behind a higher tier.

When that happens the review is updated, the last checked date changes, and the change is noted in the page rather than made silently. A review that has quietly flipped its verdict is a review you cannot trust in either direction.

What I get wrong

I will get things wrong. When you find one, tell me through the Contact page. Factual corrections get made and marked. This paragraph exists so the first correction is not a surprise to anybody.

Who writes this: one person, named, with a checkable record — Roberto Oliveira.