If you make, sell or represent a product reviewed on this site, you can ask for it to be looked at again. This page is that door — read it before you write to me.
Who this is for
The producer, seller, or an authorised representative of a product I have reviewed. Not readers with a general complaint about a product — that’s what the review’s own comments-off, contact-form-on setup is for; use the Contact page instead.
How to ask
Email roberto@microforge.app with three things: the product, the URL of the review, and what has actually changed since it was published — new terms, a fixed support issue, a corrected price, evidence I got wrong. “We’d like a better review” without a “because” is not something I can act on.
What I guarantee
- I read every request myself. One person runs this site; nothing goes to a queue nobody looks at.
- Any factual error you can prove gets corrected, in the text itself, dated — see “How corrections work” below for what that looks like.
- A full re-evaluation when the product has materially changed: new pricing, a policy that reversed, a feature that shipped or died, a support problem that got fixed.
- A reply within 15 calendar days.
What I do not guarantee
Said plainly, because burying this would make the rest of this page dishonest: a change of verdict. The stamp follows the evidence, not the request. A re-evaluation can just as easily confirm SKIP as reverse it — that is what makes a re-evaluation worth anything. If you are writing in hoping I’ll soften a WORTH IT/SKIP call because it’s inconvenient, save both of us the 15 days.
Courtesy access
If a re-evaluation requires access I would not otherwise have — an extended trial, a plan tier I would normally have to pay for — I may accept it. Two conditions, always: it’s disclosed in the review itself, not only on this page, because that is where the FTC’s endorsement guidelines say a material connection actually needs to live; and it does not buy a conclusion. Free access got you a second look, not a verdict.
How corrections work
The size of the correction matches how long the piece has been doing its job:
- Live less than two weeks: one sentence of context added in the body. Most readers never saw the earlier version — a dedicated section would overstate what happened.
- Live more than a quarter, already indexed, or cited elsewhere: a dated, dedicated block explaining what changed and why.
- Any change of verdict — WORTH IT to SKIP or back: always a dedicated, dated block, regardless of how long the piece has been up. It’s the most consequential thing this site does, and it does not happen quietly.
Nothing gets corrected in a changelog nobody reads or a silent edit. If the page said one thing yesterday and says another today, the page itself tells you that.
Read the Methodology for how a verdict gets reached in the first place, and the Affiliate Disclosure for how this site makes money.